Ivermectin: Shocking Information
Is it everything they say it is?
Written & edited by Dr. Michael W. Roth
Ivermectin has been advertised (within certain circles), touted and praised for being a life-saving drug, especially when it comes to serious COVID cases. But what do we really know about it? The information below may come as a surprise and shock to many who have not looked into what it was designed for, the side-effects that can occur, but especially, who manufactures it.
The avermectin family of compounds was discovered by Satoshi Ōmura of Kitasato University and William Campbell of Merck. In 1970, Ōmura isolated a strain of Streptomyces avermitilis from woodland soil near a golf course along the south east coast of Honshu, Japan. Ōmura sent the bacteria to William Campbell, who showed that the bacterial culture could cure mice infected with the roundworm Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Campbell isolated the active compounds from the bacterial culture, naming them "avermectins" and the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis for the compounds' ability to clear mice of worms. Of the various avermectins, Campbell's group found the compound "avermectin B1" to be the most potent when taken orally. They synthesized modified forms of avermectin B1 to improve its pharmaceutical properties, eventually choosing a mixture of at least 80% 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a and up to 20% 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1b, a combination they called "Ivermectin".
Merck was actually looking for a broad-spectrum anthelmintic, which Ivermectin is; however, Campbell noted that they "...also found a broad-spectrum agent for the control of ectoparasitic insects and mites."
Merck began marketing Ivermectin as a veterinary antiparasitic in 1981.
Following its blockbuster success as a veterinary antiparasitic, another Merck scientist, Mohamed Aziz, collaborated with the World Health Organization to test the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin against onchocerciasis in humans. They found it to be highly safe and effective, triggering Merck to register Ivermectin for human use as "Mectizan" in France in 1987.
Ivermectin earned the title of "wonder drug" for the treatment of nematodes and arthropod parasites [only]. Ivermectin has been used safely by hundreds of millions of people to treat river blindness and lymphatic filariasis.
In 2015, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded jointly to Campbell and Ōmura for discovering avermectin, "the derivatives of which have radically lowered the incidence of river blindness and lymphatic filariasis, as well as showing efficacy against an expanding number of other parasitic diseases".
There have been several studies showing evidence that Ivermectin may also help combat cancer including the following: a) Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications b) EMBO Molecular Medicine c) Pharmacological Research.
Use for COVID
Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
February 4, 2021
There is no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
Note from Dr. Roth: Since Merck has nothing to lose and everything to gain by the sale and use of Ivermectin, I believe their message regarding the ineffectiveness of Ivermectin for COVID may be a well-thought-out strategy/ulterior motive to get those using it to believe they’ve found a “cure” and are rebelling against the pharmaceutical company. In view of their history, why would Merck stand in the way of a cash cow that could potentially earn them billions of dollars by dismissing their own drug as being ineffective (unless they are purposely paving the way for a more expensive substitute or vaccine)? Yet, there are observed and documented adverse reactions to the drug.
Warnings, Precautions, and Adverse Reactions
Patients treated with STROMECTOL (generic name: Ivermectin) for onchocerciasis may experience cutaneous and/or systemic reactions of varying severity (the Mazzotti reaction), ophthalmological reactions, fatal encephalopathy, pain (including neck and back pain), red eye, conjunctival hemorrhage, dyspnea, urinary and/or fecal incontinence, difficulty in standing/walking, mental status changes, confusion, lethargy, stupor, seizures, or coma.
Ivermectin should not be used during pregnancy since safety in pregnancy has not been established.
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients weighing less than 15 kg (33 lbs.) have not been established.
Listed side effects of Ivermectin
fever, itching or skin rash
joint or muscle pain
painful and tender glands in neck, armpits, or groin
swelling of the face, hands, arms, feet, or legs
skin rash or itching
lightheadedness when getting up from a lying or sitting position
loss of appetite
shaking or trembling
The Sinister Merck History…
Written & edited by Dr. Michael W. Roth
The most disconcerting and unsettling fact of Ivermectin is that it was created and is owned by Merck, a company that has a very shady history, notwithstanding that as a pharmaceutical company, they already are in a questionable, harmful, and greedy industry.
Ivermectin has been in use for about 40 years and several months of treatment may cost about $20. This may be one of the reasons that Merck came up with an alternative (and more expensive) version of Ivermectin (Molnupiravir), even though Merck makes over 1 billion dollars annually for over 20 years! Is that not enough?
While anecdotal reports of Ivermectin’s success in treating acute COVID symptoms or as a prophylactic are abundant, it is not without serious side-effects such as: confusion, alterations in mental status, coordination or balance problems, tachycardia, loss of bowel control, seizures, light-headedness, fainting and more.
Because of its associated risks and side-effects (it is a medication after all) AND the fact that it is produced by the notorious Merck Pharmaceutical Company, I believe one may be much better off, in non-acute situations especially, resorting to and using natural remedies that are just as or even more effective and have little to no side effects. They include:
Wormwood – this is often the main ingredient in parasite cleanses due to its broad spectrum of action.
Berberine – a common anti-parasitic agent in the world of herbal medicine. It’s also used for supporting healthy blood sugar levels and can aid with Lyme treatment for its ability to target pathogens of all sorts.
Black Walnut – another anti-parasitic that helps with worm infections as well as other diseases like syphilis, diphtheria, skin wounds, pain and swelling.
Clove – Traditionally used for pathogens, this spice is very strong. It contains a compound called eugenol, which was shown in this 2019 STUDY to reduce worm burden by 19.2%.
Grapefruit seed extract or GSE – Grapefruit kills the cell membranes (if applicable) of pathogens and reduces replication of parasites, bacteria and viruses. It also has strong anti-fungal activity.
Oregano Oil – Kills cryptosporidium – for more read THIS ARTICLE.
Olive Leaf Extract – There is some evidence to suggest that oleuropein, the main active ingredient in olive leaves, can target giardina, pinworm, roundworm, cryptosporidia and other pathogens.
Calcium Disodium EDTA – a safe, effective anti-parasitic, detox agent, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and more, especially in a topical cream such EZDtox.
Merck’s Problematic Reputation
Merck has been found guilty of numerous violations of medical practices in addition to accusations of fraud, deceit and negligence, particularly in the US Gardasil case, even before their involvement in the recent COVID pandemic.
Merck’s aggressive agenda to increase HPV vaccine uptake rates, despite causing thousands of severe injuries, hit a stumbling block in a court case alleging blatant corruption.
Prior to the release of the COVID vaccines, there had been documented evidence that the HPV vaccine has caused more injuries than any other vaccination in history. Despite this evidence however, the HPV vaccination has continued to be hailed a success by the pharmaceutical industry and governments alike.
According to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) VigiAccess database, as of April 09, 2018, a total of 85,329 reports of adverse reactions have been filed regarding the HPV vaccination. These reports include 37,699 reports of nervous system disorders; 2450 cardiac disorders, (including 38 cardiac arrests) 533 reports of Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS); over 3200 reports of seizures or epilepsy, 8453 syncope and 389 deaths.
In one instance, the family of a 16-year-old daughter injured by the vaccine, brought suit against Merck accursing them of:
1. Fraud and Deceit
2. Negligent Misrepresentation
3. Defective Product – Inadequate warnings & information
4. Medical Malpractice
5. Medical Battery
Merck Accused of Fast Tracking a Vaccine for Financial Gain
Merck was accused of wrongfully and deceitfully failing to perform in the preapproval processing period and thereafter, the material scientific and medical investigations and studies relating to the safety, effectiveness and need for the Gardasil vaccine as required by and under the FDA directives and regulations.
Upon approval by the FDA of the Gardasil vaccine, defendants Merck began and engaged in highly extensive and aggressive marketing practices, which were designed primarily, if not solely, to increase sales and profits from Gardasil.
The complaint continued by describing each and every misdemeanor that Merck was thought to have participated in stating they wrongfully and deceitfully failed to unambiguously inform those to whom the marketing was directed, of material facts and information and studies specific to risk/ benefit and quantitative risk assessments regarding and including, among other things, the following:
1. The five-year period that the Gardasil vaccine was then only known to be effective.
2. That Gardasil was effective only as to certain and not other strains of the HPV virus.
3. The Gardasil vaccine is not effective once an individual is infected with the HPV virus.
4. Other existing methods that are effective in avoiding HPV viral infections.
5. The minimal risk that even once the individual was infected with the HPV virus the infection would result in precancerous lesions.
6. The successfulness of exiting methods of diagnosing and treating HPV precancerous lesions.
7. The successfulness of exiting methods of diagnosing and treating any resulting cancer; and;
8. The nature as the consequences of serious adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine.
Judge Agreed to a Science Day Hearing
In an unusual step the Judge in this case, for the first time ever, agreed to hold a “Science Day Hearing” to enable the court to get a better understanding of the science behind the HPV vaccine.
Both sides, including the vaccines manufacturer Merck, were given the unique opportunity to present to the court, their up-to-date science and studies proving or disproving the safety and effectiveness of this vaccine. The information provided would prove once and for all, whether or not Gardasil was not only a safe vaccination but necessary in the fight against cancers caused by the HPV virus.
What Science Did the Two Sides Present?
The Plaintiff’s submission, offered clear, lengthy, details and precise facts to enable the Judge to understand the science behind the vaccination including the fact that ninety-five (95%) percent of HPV infections are removed from the body by its own immune and related processes without medical or other consequences.
To support their argument, they included a wide range of scientific studies that had been written by some of the world’s leading experts and they criticized Merck for ‘misleading the public’ in their advertising campaign stating that Gardasil is not a treatment process and does not prevent cancer as marketed by Merck.
They also cited the use of aluminum salts and aluminum hydroxide bases as adjuvants in the vaccines which have been shown to be toxic to and damage the human cells at the injection site. These aluminum salts may bind with the free DNA released from the damaged and dying cells at the injection site.
In comparison, Merck appeared to offer very little in the way of scientific evidence to support their argument.
Moreover their defense was aimed more to diverting the judge’s attention away from the science by switching the focus onto the Plaintiff’s unfortunate delay in obtaining a diagnosis. Merck offered the Judge very little in the way of scientific evidence. They also chose to try and discredit SaneVax Inc, an organization dedicated to providing the public with scientific facts and evidence behind vaccination safety.
Their submission also contained a large amount of information that focused on proving that Gardasil did not cause the mentioned teenager’s condition, instead of the task at hand.
U.S. Pharmaceutical Company Merck Sharp & Dohme Sentenced in Connection with Unlawful Promotion of Vioxx - Judge Imposes $322 Million Fine for Illegal Marketing
From The Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
from Thursday, April 19th, 2012
American pharmaceutical company Merck, Sharp & Dohme was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Patti B. Saris in Boston to pay a criminal fine in the amount of $321,636,000 in connection with its guilty plea related to its promotion and marketing of the painkiller Vioxx (rofecoxib). In December 2011, Merck pleaded guilty to violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for introducing a misbranded drug, Vioxx, into interstate commerce.
In November 2011, Merck entered into a civil settlement agreement under which it will pay $628,364,000 to resolve additional allegations regarding off-label marketing of Vioxx and false statements about the drug’s cardiovascular safety. The settlement and today’s sentencing conclude a long-running investigation of Merck’s promotion of Vioxx, which was withdrawn from the marketplace in September 2004.
Merck’s criminal plea related to the misbranding of Vioxx by promoting the drug for treating rheumatoid arthritis, before that use was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In the interim, for nearly three years, Merck promoted Vioxx for rheumatoid arthritis, conduct for which it was admonished in an FDA warning letter issued in September 2001.
The settlement resolved allegations that Merck representatives made inaccurate, unsupported, or misleading statements about Vioxx’s cardiovascular safety in order to increase sales of the drug, resulting in payments by the federal government. It also resolved allegations that Merck made false statements to state Medicaid agencies about the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx, and that those agencies relied on Merck’s false claims in making payment decisions about the drug.
What’s incredibly hypocritical, sad and infuriating, in light of the current COVID Fast-Track vaccine distribution and the astounding and unprecedented adverse reactions and deaths from those vaccines, is this statement made from the Office of Public Affairs at that time: “The severity of these criminal and civil sanctions should serve as a reminder of this Office, and this department’s unwavering commitment to holding drug companies fully accountable for failures to comply with their public safety and marketing obligations, and to recovering taxpayer funds that have gone towards the purchase of illegally marketed products,” announced Carmen M. Ortiz, U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. “Any marketing activity that ignores the importance of FDA approval, or that makes unsupported safety claims about a drug is unacceptable and will be pursued vigorously in both the criminal and civil arena.”
“If all pharmaceutical manufacturers complied with the law, there would be no need for law enforcement actions,” said Susan Waddell, Special Agent in Charge for the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “But until they stop abusing the health care system and putting profits ahead of patient safety, OIG will continue to vigorously pursue corporations that flout the law.”
But these reassuring guarantees seem to have been completely forgotten when it comes to the millions who have been affected by the new “vaccines” and the tens of thousands who have died from them!
Merck’s History of Crimes and Misdemeanors – Has this Pharmaceutical Company Killed More People than the U.S. Military or Any Terrorist Organization?
From Vaccine Impact News
June 23, 2020
Which private corporation has likely been responsible for the deaths of more innocent people than any terrorist organization or military regime change in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere?
For us, the answer is evident: Merck and Company.
Iatraogenic medicine, or medical error, is now the third leading cause of death in the US after cardiovascular disease and cancer. The majority of these deaths are caused by FDA approved drugs’ adverse effects and from patients taking multiple medications without thorough clinical research to determine the safety of their synergistic effects.
Merck’s legacy of lawsuits for crimes
Merck’s legacy of lawsuits for crimes was observed beginning in the 1970s.
In 1975, it was busted by the SEC for illegal payments to foreign government officials from “approximately” 36 nations. The scam was orchestrated through personal bank accounts with the sole purpose of advancing drug approvals through foreign nations’ regulatory medical agencies.
One of the largest scandals in recent medical history was the company’s anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx that resulted in fines above $4.8 billion for causing over a minimum 60,000 deaths from sudden heart attacks and over 120,000 serious medical injuries, and for withholding scientific data about the drug’s adverse cardiovascular side effects. That number may have been greatly underreported as an independent investigation revealed that Merck may have been responsible for nearly half a million premature deaths in elderly patients, the drug’s primary target group.
In Australia, the government launched a class action suit against Merck on charges that employees allegedly planned a fake scientific paper that was ghostwritten for a medical journal in order to put Vioxx into a positive light.
Testimonies during the trial stated data was completely based upon “wishful thinking.” Merck also founded the peer-reviewed journal Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine. The journal was a fraud; it was not properly peer-reviewed and its primary purpose was to promote Vioxx on the Australian continent.
Moreover, the class action lawsuit contained Merck emails accessed by Australian officials. The company’s internal communications allegedly ordered select employees to draft up a hit list of physicians who were critical of Vioxx.
According to the documents, these physicians were targeted to be “neutralized” or “discredited.” One email said, “We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…”
Monsanto earned a similar reputation as their parent company, Bayer, had to release a public apology for the discovery of a Monsanto hit list of 200 French journalists and politicians who opposed glyphosate and its GMO crops.
Merck’s troubles with the dangers of its products, falsified data about drugs’ efficacy and safety and exaggeration of medical claims go back to the 1960s when the FDA discovered that the drug maker’s arthritis medication Indocin had not been properly tested for efficacy and its adverse effects were being completely ignored.
In the 1970s, Merck’s drug dietheylstilbestrol (DES) prescribed for the prevention of miscarriages caused a flurry of vaginal cancer cases and other gynecological disorders. Merck had all along known that DES was carcinogenic based upon its own animal clinical trials.
In 2007, its cholesterol drug Zetia was shown to increase liver disease. Again, Merck had known about Zetia’s liver risks but withheld the clinical trial’s damning results.
Merck has managed to hijack US courts
In early 2019 a ruling by Trump’s corporate-friendly US Supreme Court sided with the drug maker to squash hundreds of lawsuits for failing to issue warnings that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax may contribute to debilitating bone breaks.
Yet, a federal court in California found that Merck committed perjury for lying in a patent infringement case against Gilead Sciences over the latter’s blockbuster Hepatitis C drug Sovaldi. The judge ruled that Merck carried out a “systematic and outrageous deception in conjunction with unethical business practices and litigation misconduct.”
It turned out that Merck’s patent claims were a sham and orchestrated by its legal division.
Besides pushing dangerous medications through the FDA and onto the market, the company has also found itself in the courtroom on many occasions for allegedly price-fixing, routinely defrauding and overbilling states’ Medicare and Medicaid programs, and violating the Anti-Kickback Statute.
In 2006, the IRS went after Merck for owing almost $2 billion in back taxes. According to the Wall Street Journal, Merck partnered with a British bank to create an offshore subsidiary in tax-friendly Bermuda to divert taxable revenue on its bestselling cholesterol drugs Zocor and Mevacor through a patent scheme. The company ran the operation for ten years before the FDA uncovered the racket.
Merck is America’s leading vaccine manufacturer
Although other manufacturers have gained the spotlight since January 2021, Merck is America’s leading vaccine manufacturer and has aimed to sway public perception that vaccines are somehow safer and more effective than pharmaceutical drugs in general. Yet, it is the same industry and corporate culture that manufactures them.
Currently Merck markets vaccines for Haemophilus B, Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B (individually and in combination), human papilomavirus (Gardasil), Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR), pneumococcal, rotavirus, varicella (chickenpox) and Zoster virus (for shingles). Merck’s Adult Vaccine Portfolio expanded to include 9 of the 10 vaccines on the CDC’s adult immunization schedule. The company now holds almost a full monopoly on the government’s vaccines.
They also decided to dip their toes into developing 2 COVID vaccines that allegedly have been discontinued. No one should be surprised then that Merck and Moderna have an existing collaboration and license agreement focused on the discovery and development of mRNA-based infectious disease vaccines (COVID-19).
It is very likely that this alliance was formed because Merck, knowing their negative public perception, realized their COVID vaccination would not be well-accepted or trusted.
On its website, the FDA assures the public that “Vaccines, as with all products regulated by the FDA, undergo a rigorous review of laboratory and clinical data to ensure the safety, efficacy, purity and potency of these products.”
However, except for Gardasil, not a single one of Merck’s vaccines has ever been tested in a scientifically viable double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. In each case, the placebo in the control group was not inert, such as the use of sterile saline.
Rather, Merck only tested the vaccine with the viral component against a faux placebo containing the same ingredients, including aluminum, but minus the virus. Known as a “carrier solution,” the standard scientific protocol does not designate it as a proper placebo for measuring the efficacy and disease risks of a drug.
The Gardasil Scandal
And in the case of Gardasil, the trial was statistical trickery to mask Gardasil’s adverse effects. Therefore, the FDA’s claim is patently false. None of Merck’s vaccines have ever undergone a “rigorous review” prior to regulatory approval.
Gardasil’s success has nothing to do with the prevention of an urgent national health need. Instead, it was more likely a business strategy through Merck’s influence over our nation’s regulatory agencies and state politicians whose election campaigns it funds.
In 2018, a French oncologist, Dr. Gerard Delepine, stumbled upon a correlation between the increase of cervical cancer rates with the rising rates of Gardasil vaccinations. He observed that in all countries that prioritized pap smears, cervical cancer rates were decreasing, whereas, in those countries with higher HPV vaccination compliance, the rates increased.
Japan, Austria and Denmark no longer promote it due to its trail of injuries with fatal consequences. Public demonstrations against Merck’s Gardasil have occurred in Japan, Colombia, and Ireland. Yet, none of these efforts to warn the public about Gardasil’s risks have reached the American media.
Yet the epidemiological data suggests there is no evidence that Gardasil lowered cancer rates in counties with higher vaccine uptake. Moreover, there is zero chance of pre-teens and teens getting cervical cancer. The average age for the onset of the cancer is 50 years. Nor has the vaccine been on the market long enough to determine whether it protects a woman when she reaches even close to that age.
Its product insert for physicians states the vaccine “may not result in protection in all vaccine recipients” and it “has not been demonstrated to prevent HPV-related CIN 2/3 [abnormal pre-cancerous cervical cells] or worse in women older than 26 years of age.”
Consequently, there is no scientific rationale for states to mandate the HPV vaccine for schoolchildren let alone even vaccinating them in the first place.
In addition, the federal agencies and Merck market the vaccine under a false pretext that HPV infection is the leading cause of cervical cancer; correctly, only a third of cervical cancer cases are caused by the virus.
Robert Kennedy Jr.’s in-depth investigations through his Children’s Health Defense organization have uncovered evidence that the vaccine increases birth defects in children conceived of HPV-vaccinated moms, miscarriages have increased 2000 percent above normal, and girls are experiencing serious reproductive complications, including infertility, at approximately ten-fold above the normal rate.
Based upon Kennedy’s research and documents received from Freedom of Information Act filings, during Merck’s own Gardasil clinical trials, 2.3 percent of girls and women between the ages of 9 through 26 developed a serious autoimmune disease and crippling neurological disorders within seven months of vaccination.
The most frequent adverse effects were arthritis and anthropathy, autoimmune thyroiditis, celiac disease, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, Raynaud’s Phenomenon, rheumatoid arthritis and uveitis.
Unfortunately, the media has indiscriminately colluded with Merck. Drug companies, according to Kennedy, pay $4.5 billion to the major media networks and publications to promote their drugs. And none of the media outlets are willing to sacrifice their profits for advertising drugs on moral and ethical grounds.
Mumps Vaccine Fraud: Whistleblowers Sue
Another scandal erupted within Merck’s vaccine business in 2010 after two whistleblowers gave testimony that the mumps component in its Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine was based on fraudulent data about its efficacy, and the company knowingly proceeded in order to corner the mumps vaccine market.
According to the charges, Merck had “falsified its mumps vaccine test results to hit an efficacy rate of 95 percent.” The company achieved this by adding “animal antibodies to a blood sample to give the impression of increased antibodies.” This would certainly explain why mumps outbreaks in summer camps and on college campuses are found to occur among those vaccinated.
Merck has gained enormous political and social influence over the national perception about vaccines.
One example is Merck’s behind the scenes aggression against the film Vaxxed. When the documentary film was officially selected to screen during the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival in Manhattan, we discovered in an earlier report that Merck left its fingerprints on the film’s removal and censorship.
The film presents a harsh indictment against Dr. Julie Gerberding, the former head of the CDC who allegedly coordinated the cover up of data that confirmed thimerosal’s role in the onset of autism. After managing the agency’s operations to mine sweep the data and generate new studies with public funds to suggest thimerosal’s safety, Gerberding accepted her reward from the pharmaceutical industry by becoming the head of Merck’s vaccine division.
In addition, according to the whistleblowing of a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, Gerberding was allegedly responsible for destroying the CDC’s research that showed African American boys were at a substantially higher risk of becoming autistic from Merck’s MMR vaccine.
The full extent of the casualties from Merck’s drugs and vaccines may never be properly calculated. For firms such as Merck and Monsanto, injuries and deaths are the necessary collateral damage of getting poorly tested products on the market and as fast as possible.
Please keep in mind, Merck is the same company that is manufacturing the highly touted pharmaceutical anti-parasitic drug Ivermectin. Knowing all this, can it be trusted? Wouldn’t you want to use something as good or even more effective without the side-effects, and is made by a non-corrupt, honest and reputable supplement company?
Vaccine Whistleblower Brandy Vaughan Found Dead Inside Her Own Home as Police Open Investigation
From Medical Kidnap
Vaccine whistleblower Brandy Vaughan, a former sales executive for the pharmaceutical company Merck and the founder of learntherisk.org, a website dedicated to educating people on the risks associated with vaccines, was found dead in her home beside her nine-year-old son on December 8, 2020.
Vaughan was a vocal activist against the hazards of vaccines who founded California nonprofit Learn the Risk. On her Facebook page, she described herself as a “former pharmaceutical insider on a mission to create a healthier world one person at a time by educating on the real risks of pharma drugs and vaccines. Much of what we are told by the healthcare industry just simply isn’t the truth.”
Her death was very suspicious as she was harassed, threatened and eventually silenced, possibly by a Merck assassin. She took great care to let people know that she was not suicidal and did not take any drugs that might cause her to die suddenly emphasizing that “if something were to happen to me, it’s foul play and you know exactly who and why — given my work and mission in this life,” she continued.
A very disturbing phenomenon has been occurring for many years; that of the mysterious deaths and disappearances of high-profile anti-pharmaceutical activists. As with any corrupt, multi-billion-dollar company who wants to crush a rebellion and silence the competition standing in the way of their profits, Merck is suspected of having a part in this elimination, yet no charges or investigations are underway.
Brandy believed Big Pharma was intentionally making people sick for profit, and notes how she left her job as a pharmaceutical rep for Merck Pharmaceuticals, which she was at from 2001-2003, when Voixx, a widely used pain killer, was proven to have been causing heart attacks and strokes at twice the rate and subsequently pulled. Brandy later felt bullied by her doctors for asking to see vaccine inserts and asking questions when she chose not to vaccinate her son, causing her to further distance herself from the old paradigm.
In 2015 Brandy attended a rally against SB 277, which removed parents’ rights to cite personal beliefs as a reason for vaccine exemption, after denouncing it for 3 months. What followed was so frightening that in 2019 she announced she made arrangements for a GoFundMe should anything happen to her, to be used for investigating her potential murder. In a video, she carefully documented the frightening threats and intimidation tactics that were being used on her including multiple incidents of someone bypassing her security system, entering her house and leaving obvious signs that they could come and go as they pleased, while nothing was taken.
On one occasion she found a duck on her back patio table. She noted she realized this was a sign they were watching her, as she often told loved ones over the phone that she “felt like a sitting duck.”
It’s worth noting that Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, and Regeneron are all owned by BlackRock and Vanguard Group, which hold top shares and are made up of big tech including Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Amazon.
The pharmaceutical companies are heavily invested in politics as well “pouring millions of dollars into the legislative branch every single year,” according to Dr. Brown who told Yahoo Finance that in 2016 they spent $100 million on the elections. He goes on to explain that it doesn’t matter who the president is; if Congress is bought out by Pharma, and Congress is supposed to have oversight for the FDA, nobody is holding them accountable.
It should be clear by the above that there is a war taking place for control of our bodies and minds. We must be proactive in this fight by taking control of our health, and not trusting those companies and doctors who are capable of such greed and treachery and only have their own interests at heart (in direction violation of the law and their Hippocratic Oath).
Using orchestrated shock & awe fear tactics for the purpose of vaccines, mandates and control, the elite are simultaneously banning or eliminating anyone who steps out of line and goes against the mainstream narrative. The only way it will end is to say, “NO MORE!” No more lies, no more mandates, no more shots, no more masks, no more politicians and medical doctors trying to control our God-given rights and freedoms
Dr. Michael Roth is a retired Doctor of Chiropractic with extensive knowledge and experience in nutrition and health. After running a successful chiropractic office for nearly 15 years, Dr. Roth branched out into peripheral realms of health study to enable him to offer his clients a more complete and overall knowledge base of wellness. With a goal to glorify the Lord, he is dedicated to providing for and educate the public regarding the gaining and maintaining of dynamic health and effective body cleansing. Dr. Roth also developed a unique topical EDTA cream for the safe, gentle and effective removal of toxic chemicals, graphene oxide, heavy metals and more from the body. He can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org